Prediction of Patty Fendick vs Tatiana Ignatieva Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Fendick vs T. Ignatieva

Patty Fendick

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tatiana Ignatieva

BLR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Fendick 1 - 0 Ignatieva

They have played 2 sets in total, with Patty Fendick winning 2 and Tatiana Ignatieva winning 0. The last match between Patty Fendick and Tatiana Ignatieva was at the Oakland, 31-10-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Patty Fendick getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fendick	1
Ignatieva	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Oakland(10-31-94)

Stats

Patty Fendick

Tatiana Ignatieva

P. Fendick vs T. Ignatieva H2H Profile

P. Fendick	Stats	T. Ignatieva
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.12% (254-183)	Career Total W/L	53.29% (81-71)
1	Indoor	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Fendick vs T. Ignatieva Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patty Fendick has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tatiana Ignatieva has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patty Fendick, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tatiana Ignatieva has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Patty Fendick has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tatiana Ignatieva has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Patty Fendick has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tatiana Ignatieva winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Patty Fendick has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 137/83), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 13/14). Tatiana Ignatieva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 42/28), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 20% (W/L 2/8).
Player level: In the last year, Patty Fendick has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tatiana Ignatieva has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patty Fendick winning 1 times and Tatiana Ignatieva being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Patty Fendick winning 2 and Tatiana Ignatieva winning 0.
The last match between Patty Fendick and Tatiana Ignatieva was at the Oakland, 31-10-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Patty Fendick getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patty Fendick has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tatiana Ignatieva has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patty Fendick has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tatiana Ignatieva has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Patty Fendick has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tatiana Ignatieva has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Patty Fendick vs Tatiana Ignatieva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Fendick vs T. Ignatieva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Fendick	Stats	T. Ignatieva
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Fendick Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Canadian Open - 14-08-1995
R2 Elena MakarovaE. Makarova	W	3-6 7-5 6-3	Stats
R3 Iva MajoliI. Majoli	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
San Diego - 31-07-1995
R2 Jana NejedlyJ. Nejedly	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 26-06-1995
R1 Dominique MonamiD. Monami	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Eastbourne - 19-06-1995
R2 Jo DurieJ. Durie	W	3-6 6-4 7-5	Stats

View All

T. Ignatieva Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kiev 25K - 19-08-1996
R3 Miriam DagostiniM. Dagostini	W	6-0 6-7 6-0	Stats
SF Elena Salvador RejaE. Salvador	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
F Eugenia KulikovskayaE. Kulikovskaya	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
R4 Caroline SchneiderC. Schneider	W	6-3 0-6 6-2	Stats
Joelle SchadJ. Schad	W	5-7 7-6 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Fendick vs T. Ignatieva Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Fendick	Stats	T. Ignatieva
58.12% (254/183)	YTD Win/Loss	53.29% (81/71)
58.06% (576/416)	Sets Win/Loss	53.37% (190/166)
52.95% (4823/4285)	Games Win/Loss	50.86% (1627/1572)
62.27% (137/83)	Hard Win/Loss	55.36% (31/25)
48.15% (13/14)	Clay Win/Loss	60.00% (42/28)
48.98% (24/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	33.33% (4/8)
50.00% (23/23)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (2/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
303.7	Average Opponent Rank	363.34
41.18% (7/10)	Slam W/L	33.33% (3/6)
50.00% (1/1)	Cups W/L	41.67% (5/7)
64.86% (24/13)	Challenger W/L	76.32% (29/9)
61.29% (57/36)	Futures W/L	20.00% (2/8)
59% (254/432)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (80/149)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
60% (6/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (6/12)
45% (55/121)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (27/57)
85% (258/219)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (78/62)
15% (258/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (78/16)
20% (179/36)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (72/18)